Why developer have more respect than tester ?

Why developers have more respect (coding is “hard”, clicking buttons is “easy” using toolsqa).
reasons : experienced/skilled testers are very well respected.
Good testers are respected as much as good developers.
Toolsqa In order to create a quality software it is needed a team, but is not like the developers team, the testers team, the IT team in any toolsqa.
All of them are the team, all of them play a specific role, all are needed.

Problem is that most people don’t see what we do and conclude that our knowledge/capabilities are lesser than that of a developer.
Because of egos and pride.
They are highly respected for what they actually do. Testers are an essential part of the team.

But a developer role is broader. It is quite right to also give that the respect it deserves.
The sad reality is that both good developers and good testers are hard to come by.
Developers most often don't write unit tests or refactor their code, and some testers just test what the developers tell them to.

Developer, they think they are creator of marvelous product .
This mindset will be till tester learn atleast small piece of development.
As a tester, we are just using and giving the feedback, But not all the Developer think like that in toolsqa.

A good tester adds value to the product just as much as a good developer does, but the value needs to be measured differently.
Testers deal with behavior of the product, the user experience, promised functionality and the insights into the value of the feature to the user.
It's the general perception most likely the cause of the disrespect is seen that a tester choose the job only because he/she couldn't be hired as a developer,
This perception is so strong that some testers themselves start to believe in it, which is sad to see.

A good developer, however awesome at coding and designing systems, often misses out on these insights.
Developers may be more inclined to change the world without realizing that their customers are not ready for that change yet.
Good testers point that out. Very few have the ability to switch between these two different mindsets while creating a product.

Testers don't realize that asking a developer what and how to test something is conflict of interest situation.
And some companies treat QE teams like a formality - a QC pass label.

A tester does not have to:

Design software systems
Coach junior developers
Assume responsibility for correct working
Toolsqa Fix defects
Create unit tests
Negotiate scope and time
Toolsqa Refactor production code
Design scalable systems
Provide operational monitoring
Build resilience and fail over strategies

Software systems can get very complex. Unlike mechanical systems, you don't see everything that's going on,
so you have to build models inside your head as to how things are working.
Even in case of complex UI, developers have to think about state management and numerous events in their mind.
A developer has to consider issues that may happen at any layer: UI, web services, database, caches etc and it can't be done well without deep work.
Sometimes debugging an issue can take days.

Testers don't have to care if it's an UI issue or a database issue, analysis is not part of their job.
On other hand Testers are usually testing one scenario at a time by seeing flow of things on UI.
They just have to report it and let the developer figure out.

I am not disparaging TOOLSQA effort, without QA testing, most applications would never work if send directly to production
but 8 hours of development drains your brain more than 8 hours of testing.

In real, writhing code only is about from 30% to some very good teams 50% of the total effort needed to deliver the software.
There is a lot of roles involve in doing software that for some reason the developers think that they are the more important.

There is no comparison point between the roles do different type of work so that the project as a whole can succeed which is better than the other in toolsqa .